"You look like you're
old enough to be in school. What are you doing in this bookstore during school
hours?"
Our daughter Brooke, then
eight years old, looked up at the stranger and said, "I am in school."
"No, you're
not," he retorted, "you're standing next to me looking at books."
"I'm always
learning," Brooke replied. "These books are school for me." About that time
I came over and the old man said, "Your daughter has taught me a thing or two. I've
never thought of school that way."
The old man had been
programmed to think that school was only in operation when the bell rang and the children
sat down at their desks. There's no bells at our school and our children don't even have
desks. But "school" is in session during all their waking hours.
Education is not just
filling up a child's brain with facts and figures from a book. Intellectual knowledge is
only a small part of education. A more important aspect of learning is gaining practical
wisdom and understanding. It involves learning respect for the authority of parents and
learning to love and forgive each other. Children form a close bond with their parents and
brothers and sisters as they work together and help one another.
Home education does not
need to be expensive. We went to a used book store and purchased a set of 1960's Compton's
Encyclopedia for under $10. We also picked up some old math and science books. The
children have spent many hours on their own looking up various topics of interest in these
books. Yesterday our daughter Brooke was curious about volcanoes. She checked out what the
encyclopedia said and wanted to learn more. I gave her a book on the eruption of Mount St.
Helens. I read parts of it to her and she eagerly finished the rest of the book. The next
thing I knew she was writing a short story about a man whose farm was threatened by an
erupting volcano. Our younger daughter participated by listening to the Mount St. Helens
story and then drawing pictures of erupting volcanoes.
We do not expect them to
spend a set amount of time doing math, then science, then spelling each day. That plan is
too rigid. We use an integrated approach. If they are studying volcanoes, for instance,
they will be attaining reading and science skills. Then if they write a story about
volcanoes, they'll be using their spelling and writing skills and maybe their math skills.
This is a much more natural way to gain knowledge and the children are more likely to
remember what they have learned.
Children often forget what
they memorize unless they understand the concept and put it to practical use. To commit
facts or concepts to long-term memory, first involves understanding the concept.
"What we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked upon and
our hands have handled...." (1 John 1:1) is a great way to learn.
Our favorite way to learn
history is by reading biographies. To make 16th century history come alive, read a
biography of Luther or Tyndale. For hands-on science, we like the Peterson Field Guides.
There are guides on birds, shells, butterflies, stars, wildflowers, mammals and insects.
Spelling and grammar are corrected as needed when the children write stories. Our
reference manual for secretaries contains basic grammar and punctuation pointers in an
easy-to-find format.
We usually give our
children a set of math problems to solve once or twice a week. They work out of a math
book or sometimes we give them practical problems. We use catalogs or supermarket ads and
send them on imaginary shopping trips where they buy products using their math skills. We
also make a point of having the children use their math skills in practical ways
throughout the day. "Our neighbor Joe was born in 1911. How old is he?" Or, we
ask them to double a bread recipe and calculate the new amounts.
The most intense
instruction is done when they are learning to read. That is a time of closeness between
the child and parent. Learning to read will go smoothly if the child is ready to learn the
concepts. Both our girls didn't start reading seriously until age 8. Prior to that time,
we made up games that familiarized them with the sounds of vowels, consonants and blends.
Once they started to actually read, they progressed rapidly. By age 10, our eldest
daughter could read almost any adult book. Our children are not forced to be on the same
time schedule for learning skills as their peers in the world. When they are ready to
learn, we are there to guide them.
We used a simple, basic
phonics book to teach them to read. (Alpha-Phonics by Samuel L. Blumenfeld). Watch out for
elaborate phonics programs that are expensive and can bewilder a child and overwhelm
parents. Once the child begins reading, it is important that they read out loud to someone
for about 15 minutes every day. After several months of daily reading out loud, many
children learn to love reading and prefer it to movies. Even though our children can read
on their own, we still enjoy reading a good book together in the evening.
The easiest way to convey
needed information to our children is by including them in practical living experiences or
to gather them round and read to them. We also tell them stories about our childhood or
other first-hand experiences. Our children love to hear about how their Great Grandfather
escaped from England by being a stowaway on board a ship headed for America.
We like doing things
together like planting a vegetable garden or making cookies or baking bread. Our children
also help on the ministry by collating and stapling and by filling orders. Home educated
children have many practical learning experiences that will benefit them when they set up
their own household. The closeness and bonding that develops from home education is
precious - and is not possible when children are sent away to school. But far more
important than all these advantages, is gaining the understanding that Jesus Christ is
King. In every thing that we do, we acknowledge Him and seek to do His will. We often
refer to The Sermon on the Mount (Matthew Chapters 5 through 7) and the Book of Proverbs
because they are full of principles for daily living.
The world has its agenda -
to socialize children to fit into the world order. We are different. Through our
allegiance to Jesus Christ we are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the
household of God (Ephesians 2:19). We train our children, not to be good citizens of the
world, but to be faithful citizens of the nation of Heaven.
Parents who are
teaching their children at home need not force them to read chapter after chapter in
lifeless textbooks, nor answer question after question in silly workbooks. Curricula like
that are expensive and destroy children's creativity. There is a better way:
by Susan Schaeffer Macaulay
Much of the educational
material offered today is mentally inferior and useless. How colorfully and scientifically
our generation talks down to the child! What insipid, stupid, dull stories are trotted
out! And we don't stop there. We don't respect the children's thinking or let them come to
any conclusions themselves! We ply them with endless questions, the ones we've thought up,
instead of being silent and letting the child's questions bubble up with interest. We tire
them with workbooks that would squeeze out the last drop of anybody's patience. We rob
their minds of proper, interesting, strong meat to nourish their growing needs. Many small
children are robbed of free and happy childhood play by endless "Play-approach"
lessons that bore them and leave no time for imaginative real play in or
out-of-doors.
I feel profoundly sad that
such things should be happening. It need not be so. We have to be willing to start again.
Here is a challenge:
Get a few really good
books, and read them together aloud. Set aside a good regular chunk of time. This will
be one of the most rewarding and stimulating relationships in your life. Guess what? If
you have the courage to be honest, that youngster's comments and questions are really
going to make you think, think hard. You can throw away all the manuals. That child
has an awful lot to teach you. Your mind is probably in a worse state than his. After
reading together, go to a really nice place outside for a couple of hours at least. Don't
rush. Turn a rock over and watch the beetle run away. Throw rocks in the stream and slide
down a hill.
Talk together. You'll find
yourself enjoying it! Relax.
It isn't as hard as the
experts make out. We are human beings, persons, created to live. To have life more
abundantly. Wonder together; grow together. Together share the struggles of knowing
that we cannot perfectly follow God's law. We are fellow-pilgrims. We walk side by
side as human beings under the love and authority of Him who made us.
It is important that a
child is read to. Not isolated little stories, but really good books, chapter by chapter.
Read all sorts of things. Biographies of historical figures, works of literature, stories
about faraway places, fables, stories about animals and birds. Always read really good
books, chosen carefully by the criterion that a book should be "really valuable for
its own sake, accurate, and interesting, of a kind that the child may recall - with
pleasure."
Try this for yourself.
Read the child a good tale full of interest and then ask him to tell you about the story.
As he puts it into words, he has to think for himself. He uses his memory, and he is
attending deeply. His own reactions and expression are involved. It is a total human
activity. You don't need to reduce the child's appreciation to elementary
"true/false" tests. The child has acquired knowledge, and having expressed it
creatively in his own words, he will be able to remember what he has learned.
Children benefit from
working steadily through a well-chosen book. And if they narrate it to you, it will become
theirs. But more happens. Because they've tackled a complete book, they become acquainted
with its flow and its use of language. They are students of another person - the author.
Further, they are allowed to notice the content themselves. As they aren't forced to
memorize facts, they are free to react to the writing themselves. They are the ones who
decide what parts they consider important. It becomes an active experience of the mind,
personality, and language.
"Education," said
Lord Haldane, "is a matter of the spirit." No one knoweth the things of
man but the spirit of a man which is in him; therefore there is no education but
self-education. Our business is to give the child mind-stuff, and both quality and
quantity are essential. Naturally, each of us possesses this mind-stuff only in limited
measure, but we know where to procure it; for the best thought the world possesses is
stored in books. We must open books to children, the best books; our own concern is
abundant and orderly serving.
The child's self-education
begins with listening to carefully chosen books read out loud to him every day. He
then sometimes tells back in his own words what he has heard. Or he may draw a picture to
illustrate what he has pictured in his imagination. When older, the same child will read
for himself and write essays which narrate some part of what he has read.
Let me try to indicate
some of the advantages of this approach to learning that I am urging. It fits all ages,
even the seven ages of man! It satisfies brilliant children and discovers intelligence in
the dull. It secures attention, interest, and concentration, without effort on the part of
the teacher or the taught.
Reprinted from FOR THE
CHILDREN'S SAKE, by Susan Schaeffer Macaulay, published by Crossway Books, Westchester,
Illinois.
Should we obey state laws?
Nearly every family who is
educating their children at home is confronted with the question: Should we disobey the
state law? While in most states, it is not illegal to school at home, the state does
impose certain requirements upon parents who home school. State law may require that
parents register with the school district. They may require that a particular home school
program be approved. Children who are home schooled might be required to be tested
regularly. Parents who do not comply with these regulations may find themselves being
visited by truant officers threatening to take away their children if they continue home
schooling. Or fathers may face child neglect or other criminal charges if they refuse to
comply with the demands of a school superintendent.
Even though we are engaged
in the Biblically-ordained activity of educating our children in the way they should go,
the state may view us as lawbreakers. At what point do we submit ourselves to the state's
demands? If the state wants to be notified that we are educating our children at home, do
we notify them? If the state wants our children tested each year, do we have our children
tested? If the school district demands that we show them the textbooks we are using, do we
show them? If the superintendent wants us to come to his office for a visit, do we go?
When do we "give to those who ask" and when do we "obey God rather than
men?"
Some advocate a position
of "total obedience" to the state. After all Peter does say, "Submit
yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake" (I Peter 2:13).
At the other extreme of
this issue are those who advocate "total disobedience" based on the principle
that "we ought to obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29).
The answer to this dilemma
lies in knowing our residency. If we are residents of the state, then it is a privilege
granted by the state to home school. And that privilege can be regulated or even taken
away. But if we are residents of Heaven, then the state is a foreign entity to us. The
state school system is not our school system and our children are not eligible to attend
public schools unless we pay nonresident rates. We do not educate our children under a
state-granted privilege. We educate our children under the authority of Jesus Christ.
Can residents of Heaven ask for
"approval"?
At the cornerstone of all
the regulations imposed upon those who educate their children at home are the
"approval laws." An "approval law," in effect, grants permission to a
state resident to home school if the local superintendent approves. Once you've submitted
to the approval laws, you've obligated yourself to submitting to other state requirements
such as mandatory testing of children or state approval of your curriculum. Many states
have approval laws. Should residents of Heaven seek approval from the state to educate
their children? No, and neither did Daniel when he was faced with a similar situation.
The incident is recorded
in Daniel, Chapter 1. Daniel purposed in his heart to obey God, regardless of what men
might say.
Daniel was a captive in
Babylon being trained in government service. His training was in what could be called the
Babylonian Public School system. This system had compulsory attendance and compulsory
eating laws. Daniel was commanded to eat the king's meat and drink the king's wine. To do
so would have violated the instructions Daniel had received from God's law.
On the surface it may seem
Daniel sought and obtained approval from the Babylonian school system to engage in his
alternative eating program. But the crucial fact is recorded in the eighth verse,
"Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the
portion of the king's meat, nor with the wine which he drank."
Daniel proposed an
alternative vegetarian diet. But it didn't matter how the officials answered because
Daniel had already purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself. If
Daniel would have asked the Babylonian officials for "approval" of his eating
program, he would have been submitting himself to the decision of the officials. If they
would have disapproved, he would have been forced to defile himself with the king's meat.
Similarly, when those who
educate at home ask for "approval," they are really saying, "We will abide
by your decision. If you approve of our home education program, then we will continue. But
if you say no, we will quit educating our children at home." When parents submit
to "approval laws," they obligate themselves to abide by the decision of the
officials.
If Daniel had sought
"approval," even though he had purposed in his heart not to defile himself, he
would have been deceitful. In the same way, parents who purpose in their heart to educate
their children at home, are being deceitful if they seek approval from the state. If God
has instructed them to educate at home, they have all the authority they need. They should
not seek approval from men.
Daniel wisely avoided
submitting himself to the official's decision or even appearing as though he planned to do
so. Instead, he gave the official notice that he was opting out of the King's eating
program.
If we believe that God
forbids us to seek state approval for the education of our children, we need to stand on
that conviction. When we are questioned about our children's education, we can give notice
to the officials that our children are being educated under the authority of Jesus Christ
through His Church. Now we have informed the officials of our intent, which is far
different from asking for their permission. In a kind way, we have told the state
officials that our children's education is none of their business - it is the Lord's
business.
Daniel is one of God's
prime examples of a man who maintained a proper separation from ungodly government. Daniel
had no problem giving the officials notice of his intent to obey God. When we are
questioned by school officials, we can do the same. Daniel was a man of conviction who was
prepared to go to the lion's den if need be. Let us pray that we also stand until the end
when our convictions are tested.
Reprinted from Embassy of
Heaven NEWSLETTER, Issue No. 924, Fall 1992.
The following message
is a transcript of a lecture given by Attorney David C. Gibbs, Jr.
The court says a very
particular thing about our beliefs and it is at this point that your testimony in the
courtroom becomes quite critical. The court says a man cannot hold those beliefs if he
cannot describe them. The court said a belief is not a hunch. It is not a feeling, it is
not "it seems to me." We have people who go to the witness stand and say,
"what do you believe about this?" and they will say what they believe.
"Well, why do you
believe that? Can you show me in the Word of God?" And they will say, "I don't
even know if it is in the Word of God but it sorta seems to me. . . ." and the court
says that the problem with "well it seems to me" is that feelings change rapidly
and as a consequence they are not going to honor hunches, they are not going to honor
feelings, they are not going to honor "it seems to me."
You must be able to take
these beliefs in the Bible and make them oral. You must be able to break them down. The
Court says you don't need to be eloquent. We can bring a man up here who would be a
teacher in your Bible department, for example, and he might be able to systematize his
beliefs. The court says that is not required, but you must somehow be able to make your
beliefs vocal.
The second thing the court
said is that you must be able to have a knowledge of those beliefs. This becomes important
because we like to hide behind a title. We say, "I am a separated
fundamentalist." "I am a Christian." Those are three descriptive terms. Now
tell us what that means. It is not simply enough to tell the court a general term. You
must tell the court what those terms mean. In this matter of beliefs and believers, the
Court suddenly realized there had to be a test. The court said there must be a way that we
can determine which beliefs are to be upheld and which beliefs will not be honored and
protected by the First Amendment.
In 1972 the court came
down with the test. And ironically, they came down with the test in the case which
involves Christian education. A man who lived in the State of Wisconsin by the name of
Yoder was an Amishman. And he told the state of Wisconsin, "I am not going to send my
children to your schools anymore." The state of Wisconsin said, in effect, "you
can't do that. You have to send your children to our school." He said, "I don't
think you hear me, I am not going to send my children to your school." They said, in
effect, "Mr. Yoder, if you don't send your children to our school we will have to sue
you. Do you want us to sue you?" He said, "No." They said, "have you
ever been sued before?" He said "No." They said, "Send your children
to our schools." He said, "I don't think you heard me. I am not going to send my
children to your schools."
I don't know if you have
ever talked to a stubborn Amishman, but you might as well talk to the back side of a barn
for the result you are going to get. They said, basically, "Look, If we sue you and
we win you could go to jail." He said, "I don't want to go to jail."
"Put your children in the school." He said "I am not going to send my
children to your school." They said "If you don't do it and we win the court
case you will be put in jail and once in jail you could even lose your children." He
said, "I wouldn't like any of that." Then they said, "Well, put the kids in
the school." He said, "I don't think you understand. My religious beliefs
prohibit that I do that."
They took him to court and
he didn't fare so well. He lost. And they said, "Now, you had your day in court, send
your kids to our schools." He said, "I am not going to."
He found out a very
interesting thing. He didn't give up. He lost his appeal and they said, "Send your
kids." And he still said, "I am not going to do it." Finally, he got to the
United States Supreme Court and they said to Mr. Jonas Yoder, "You don't have to send
your kids to that school because the First Amendment protects you," and they laid
down the test that was to be used on all subsequent cases to determine which beliefs are
to be protected and which are not to be protected. (Wisconsin v Yoder 406 US 205, 32 L Ed
2d 15, 92 S Ct 1526)
The first thing the court
did in defining the test was to say this, "Every single religious belief is one of
two types. It doesn't matter what your belief structure is, or who you are, every single
religious belief you have is one of two types." They said it is either a conviction
or a preference. The court said that is all there is. We don't find that there is
any other type of beliefs.
Let us define the two for
you. Because, bear this in mind, in the United States of America only convictions
are protected by the constitution. Preferences are not.
Let us look at a preference.
That is a very, very strong belief. It is a belief that you hold with great intensity and
strength. In fact, let me tell you how strong that belief can be. That belief can be so
strongly held by you that you go into full time service in the name of that belief. You
can be a minister of the gospel, a Christian school teacher, or a missionary. That is a
strong belief. The second thing that makes this belief strong is that it is belief that
you can hold with such intensity that you give all of your wealth to it. I don't know very
many people who have given everything. The court says you can do that and still have only
a preference.
The third thing is that
your belief can have such strength and fiber to it you can be energetic in proselyting
other people. You can stand on the street corner and witness. Every time there is Thursday
night visitation you are there. Saturday morning you have a zeal toward spreading the
gospel. The court said you can have all of that zeal and still only have a preference.
Then notice one final
thing. They said you can be so convinced this belief is good that you can want to teach it
to your children. Now that is a very important thing. I sat next to a man on an airplane
one day and he was telling me all about his troubles with his business and how his
personal life had degenerated. And then we started talking about his son, and he said he
really wants his son to go to the same school he went to and undergo the same training he
had, and run the same business he was running. And I asked that man, "Did running
this business and going to that school bring you any happiness or satisfaction at
all?" He said, "No, none at all." I said, "why would you want that
same thing for your child?" He said, "I don't know, I just thought it would be a
good idea."
I think he wished on his
child the same thing that had been wished on him. We have the same problem with our faith.
We hold it very dear and as a matter of that endearment, we want our children to have it
because we know that faith can take them to a home in heaven and give them a life that is
meaningful and Christian. The court said you can believe all of that and still only have a
preference. Here is what makes a belief a preference. It is a very strong belief but it
is a belief that you will change. You prefer it. That is why we call it a preference.
But you will change that belief under some circumstances.
The courts have reviewed
these circumstances and have found some circumstances that cause people to change their
beliefs. Let's talk about them. Circumstance number one is called peer pressure. A
minister studies the Word of God and says, "Here is something I know I must do."
He resolves in his heart that he is going to do it. Then he goes out to his friends, other
ministers, people in his congregation and says, "this is what I am going to do."
And the other ministers say, "Hold on just a minute. You are right. We don't say that
you are wrong. But couldn't you tone it down just a little bit? Couldn't you fix it so
that we could cooperate with you? Couldn't you come around just a little bit so that is
not so offensive to us and maybe you could still get done what you wanted to do."
That minister said, "This is what I believe," and then little by little he
bends. And he proves that what he first said was a preference. He preferred it. He
wanted to do it. He resolved to do it. But he changed. The Court said that if you
can change that belief, that belief is a preference.
Now bear this in mind. If
a person can ever show you from the Word of God where you should change something then you
must change it. But we are talking about peer pressure causing good men to change. The
court said if that will change it, it is a preference. There is another area we see peer
pressure all the time. Ministers come to us and say, "I agree with everything you are
saying but how am I going to go home and sell that to the troops back at the church? The
people in the church are not going to agree." That man knows what he believes is
right but the pressure of the people causes him to bend. The court said if you can do that
you have a preference.
Secondly, they noted a
cause of change is a family pressure. That is probably one of the strongest pressures I
know of. A man says, "This is what I am going to do," and his wife says,
"Please don't. You know what is right, but please don't. We just got everything
settled, let's not blow it wide open again." And as a consequence that man changes
his beliefs. The court said if family pressure will cause you to change, your
beliefs are preferences.
Now there is a third area
we see is a strong pressure and brings out preferences, and that is a lawsuit. I
know a lot of men who will say "David, I am for this but I am just not going to get
sued over it. Can you imagine what they are going to do if they sue us, Dave?"
Back in the Lord's day
they had the scribes and the pharisees. The Scribes are still alive today. They run the
newspapers. And these men know they are going to be hung by the newspapers. They know that
most of the people in their church are not going to understand why they are taking this
stand that caused them to be sued. They know of families they are going to lose.
Everyone likes to talk
about Levi Whisner and his great victory in Ohio. (Whisner v Ohio is an Ohio Supreme Court
case involving sending children to an unapproved, private Christian school). Everyone
likes to talk about Roy Forrest and his great victory in Concord, New Hampshire. What
nobody likes to talk about is men who have churches of about one hundred and they reduce
to twenty. And a man with a church of 350 to 400 reduced to 60. Now would you do that, or
would you say, "David, I'm just not going to take a stand that is going to cause me
to get sued because I don't want to see that happen."
If that would cause you to
change your beliefs then your belief was a preference.
The next area the court
noted that caused people to change was jail. And I know in our circles today that
we like to speak of jail very lightly. People say that jails are souped up holiday inns.
They have just not seen enough jails. Jails are horrible places. One of the things that we
forget is that when you go there you are isolated from all your Christian influence. They
tell you when to go to bed, when to get up, when to eat, how to eat, when to stand, when
to sit, when you go to the restroom. And suddenly you are thrown into the middle of that
with brutal men. Men who normally relish the thought of breaking a Bible-toter. You are an
offense to them there, and they hate you on their ground, and they are going to break you.
Now, would you go to jail
for a matter of your faith? No one is going to understand why you have gone. If you
read the histories of the great men of the faith, when they went to jail nobody understood
why they went. Although many of the great men of the faith did go at one time or
another. Would going to jail cause you to change your beliefs? If it would, then your
beliefs are preferences.
Let me ask you one other
question because it is right on point. A man says, "I will go to jail." You
probably don't know what you are talking about, but none the less you say I believe I
could. Would you, as a man, watch your wife go to jail? Levi Whisner faced that. Levi
Whisner and his wife made plans for who was going to take care of their children while he
and his wife were incarcerated.
The question is, what does
that belief mean to you? If it is a preference, I want to do it but I have the
right not to do it if I don't want to do it. The Court says that is not
protectable. The
last thing is, the Court said, "I suppose that a man has to be prepared to die
for his belief." Is that belief changeable? You know, there are may things in
this life worse than dying, and denying the faith is one of them. The court said,
"Would you die for your beliefs?"
The court said a conviction,
on the other hand, is a belief that you will not change. Why? What creates a
conviction? The Court said only one thing. A man believes that his God requires it of him.
A belief that is God ordered is a conviction. It is a matter of believing
with all of your heart that God requires something of you. The court said, "when you
believe that your God has required something of you, you will withstand all of the tests
they have spoken about." The court said the first thing would be for you to decide,
is your belief a conviction or is it a preference? Is it a belief that you
hold that is God ordered, because preferences are simply not protected by the
constitution.
Now the Court noted
another interesting point about this, and it parallels with a story in scripture about the
three Hebrew children, Shadrack, Meshack and Abednego. The Court said a conviction is not
something you discover, it is something you purpose. It is not something you
accidentally come across, but something you purpose in your heart as a fabric of
your belief system. Dr. Bob Jones used to say that he has never seen a man made by
a crisis. Never. I used to think that was a strange saying. He said I have never seen a
man made by a crisis, the crisis just exposes the man for what he already is and
that is exactly what the court is looking at. The court said your convictions will be purposed.
If you study the history
of the three Hebrew children in Daniel you will find that they did a strange thing. When
taken into captivity, Shadrack, Meshack and Abednego purposed in their hearts not to
defile themselves. It was something about which they determined with resolve. The court
said your convictions must be determined by you or else those convictions will not be
there.
You will recall what
happened to Shadrack, Meshack and Abednego. A golden image was erected, and all of the
people were supposed to bow when the instruments played. The musical instruments played.
The scriptures say these three stood erect. A question has to be asked at this point.
"Where were all the other Hebrews?" There were more than three Hebrews in the
land. That is clear from the opening passages. Where were the other Hebrews? The other
Hebrews were kissing the dirt making sure that they were in compliance with the King's
orders. The scriptures say that the three Hebrew children were the only ones that stood
erect. The court says this. If it is required of you that people stand with you
before you will stand, your beliefs are preferences and not convictions.
I have had preachers come
to me and say, "Dave, I believe that I ought to stand on this issue but I will only
stand if you can get this or that conference to say that I should stand. If you can get
this school organization to say that I should stand, get me some people to stand with
me." The question has to be asked, "As great as those people may be, what do
they have to do with what God requires of you?" And the Court said that is a valid
test. If other people have to stand with you before you will stand, your beliefs are preferences
and not convictions. Now you remember what happened. They were taken before the
king and the king was upset. He said, "Do you know what you have done?" and
before they could even answer he did a strange thing. He broke the law. He said, "I
am going to give you a second chance. If the next time, when those instruments play, you
bend down all will be well. If not, nobody is going to deliver you out of my hands. You
are dead men." Now you know what I think we would have done. I think most of us would
have said, "Praise the Lord. We are alive, we are breathing. God has given us another
chance," and we would have been excited. The three Hebrew children did not do that.
Do you know what they said? They said, "King, we don't have to be careful how we
answer you because if you give us another chance or not, nothing is going to change. We
have resolved we are not going to bow and that is not going to change." What
the three Hebrew children were telling the king is, "This matter of our faith
is nonnegotiable." The court said if you can discuss the negotiation of your
faith, your faith is a matter of preference and not conviction because convictions
are nonnegotiable.
Why? How do you negotiate
something that God ordered? The court said you can't. So if they can get you into a
dialogue where you negotiate, the court said this is a matter of preference and not
conviction.
Now, recall what the three
Hebrew children said, because it is the last point. "King, we believe that our God
can deliver us, but even if you throw us into that furnace and God does not deliver us we
are not going to bow." What they are saying to the King is, "Whether we come out
of that furnace or not our beliefs stand firm." The court said if you must be
assured of victory before you stand, your beliefs are preferences and not
convictions. And that is a test they are narrowing in on more and more because more
of our men are more concerned with winning than with standing. You bear this in
mind. In the Christian faith we do not fight for victory we fight in
victory. We have already won. The only thing we are doing now is
standing in that victory. When Levi Whisner went to trial and lost, he still won.
When he appealed and lost, he won. When he went to the Supreme Court of the State
of Ohio and they unanimously said he was right, he was right all along. A court does
not tell us whether we are right or wrong. We are right as long as we honor the Word of
God and Levi Whisner recognized that.
We also must recognize
that Levi Whisner stood in this country when no other man saw the issues, when no other
man even cared to see the issues. He saw them and he won the liberty for all of us. He
stood with no one beside him. All the tests of preference versus conviction were applied,
he passed.
Now, the court said we
have a problem, and the problem is that sometimes people don't tell the truth. In the
courtroom, I don't know that I have ever seen anybody lie but I have seen some men who
have been incredibly casual with the truth, and the court has recognized this. The court
says there must be a way to know whether what you are saying is the truth or not. But how?
How do we know if you have a preference or conviction? The difficulty is that there are
going to be lawyers like David Gibbs. And when you are ready to go to court, here is what
I am going to tell you. When you walk in there, you make "conviction" your
middle name. You get it out as often as you can. It doesn't matter what the
circumstances, keep using the word "conviction." Well, the court said how do we
know whether you have those convictions or not?
And then they came up with
a test. This "conviction," they say, will always show up in a person's
lifestyle. They said, "what is on the inside of a man is always going to show on
the outside of a man." And if that is true, and we teach that it is true, they
say, "what we need to do is look at what is on the outside and recognize that it is
there because of what is on the inside." And the court said you do not have the right
to say you have a conviction unless we can somehow see you live that conviction with some
element of consistency.
Now, they began to apply
the test and somehow people began to squirm. They asked "Do they have this
right?" The Word of God says a strange thing. The book of James says, "Don't
tell me about your faith, show me your faith." Because faith without works is dead.
It is like a body with no spirit; it is all there but it is meaningless. Because the thing
providing the fibers that give life to our faith, is our works. If that is absent, then it
is all useless. So the court came back and said, "We want to see your faith in
action and we want to see it in order to prove that it is a conviction."
Let me give you some
examples. A man stands up and says, "You ought to send your child to a Christian
school. We believe that a Christian school is the only place for your child. It will be an
education in the truth. We want you to send your child to a Christian school because it
will make the Bible the foundation for his life, However, if you are not going to send
your child to a Christian school, then you have your child be the best witness he can in
the public school." What have I just said? I have just said a preference. I have said
I want you to send your child to a Christian school. I prefer it, and you ought to, but if
you are going to do the other then do the best you can. The court said that is a classic
preference statement.
And so, what they are
looking for is this. If we say that something is a matter of conviction, where do we get
our convictions from? Where do we get all our beliefs from? We get them from the Word of
God. Now, when a child comes to Sunday School for the first time what do we teach a child
that it is to disobey the Word of God? We teach that child that it is a sin. The court
says the opposite of "conviction" is "sin." And you must stand
for that or else it is not a conviction. We really have nothing to take exception to,
because that is consistent with our beliefs. If the Bible requires it, it is God ordered.
If it is God ordered, it is a conviction. If it is a conviction and if God ordered it,
what is it not to do it? It is a sin because it is disobedience to what God has ordered.
And that is the classic definition of sin. So before you say something is a
conviction you must be prepared to take a stand to say the opposite of that is a sin.
If you say, "I have a conviction about Christian education" you must be prepared
to say not to give a child Christian education is a sin. If you say, "I have a
conviction about certain matters of a Christian lifestyle - the refraining from the use of
alcohol-" you must say the opposite is a sin or it is not a conviction. A person who
says "I believe I ought to do something, but I think that I should be more tolerant,
a little more open minded about this," he is saying a preference and the court says, "make
up your mind what you believe!"
Remember what I said. The
court said knowledge about your beliefs is critical in the courtroom. You must be able to
define what you believe. You must tell the court whether you hold them as preferences or
convictions, and you must be able to explain to the court that the opposite of these
convictions is a sin. What happens if you don't tell them it is a sin? We have this
happen:
"Pastor, do you
believe that every child must receive a Christian education?"
"Yes, I do."
"Well, Pastor, do you
hold that as a conviction of your faith?"
"Yes, I do."
"Well, Pastor have
you ever told your people that not to give a child a Christian education is a sin?"
"Well, no I haven't
done that."
"Why haven't you done
that Pastor?"
"I just haven't
gotten around to it."
"How long have you
been in getting around to it?"
"Oh, a couple
years."
Then they will say,
"Pastor isn't it true
the reasons you have never said that is because you were afraid of the effects of that?
You were afraid that the public school teachers in you church would leave? You were afraid
that the people who don't believe in Christian education in your congregation but are good
givers might be offended? You were afraid of what the repercussions would be? Isn't that
why you didn't say that?"
Now, bear in mind, that
man has taken an oath to tell the truth in that courtroom, and he must now answer that
question. The court said if you say you have a conviction make sure that you do. Otherwise
the court becomes a very painful place to be trapped with those convictions.
Now in this matter of
lifestyle consistency the court said one further thing. When we say "consistent
practice" we mean reasonably consistent, not perfect. But one judge said it to me, I
think, very aptly. He said, "David, your people don't have to be perfect but they are
getting to be awfully perfect in being imperfect. As a consequence I would like you to see
if we can't match up the two L's. Life and lip." And that is what a
good part of every court case is about. Is what you say with you mouth practiced with your
life consistently? Is it a conviction of ours that matters of pornography should not be
viewed? Is it a conviction of ours that matters of obscenity should not be viewed? Is it a
conviction of ours that unrighteous themes should not be exalted? That is, you take what
is base and low and make it seem to be right and good and just. That is a conviction of
the Bible. Is it a conviction of ours that righteousness should be exalted? You have seen
godly characters made to look like fools. That is taking a righteous theme and debasing
it. Are those convictions of ours? Those are all conviction upon which we place the
Christian school movement.
I think if I were to ask
most of you here, you would say the Bible teaches every one of those things. "They
are a conviction with me." Why? Because the Bible requires it. Is it a sin to do it
otherwise? Yes.
All right, they will ask
you all of those questions I have asked you in the courtroom and then they are going to
ask you this, "Do you own a television." And you'll say, "Yes I do."
"How much did that television cost? Five hundred dollars?" "Where do you
keep that television? In the living room or in the family room?" "Why do you
keep it there?" "We keep it there so that the most people can see it."
"Now, answer me this about that television. Isn't it true that if you don't plug that
television in and turn it on it is inoperable? That television cannot do anything to you
until you do something to it. For it to reach you, you have to make it reach you, isn't
that true?" "Yes, that's all true." "Having said all of that, let me
ask you this, on this television, do you ever hear obscenity? Do you ever hear someone
cuss?" "Yeah." I had a preacher say to me the other day that he got rid of
his television set. He said, "I was sitting in my living room and the thing swore at
me." He said, "There ain't nobody going to sit in my house and swear at
me." So he got rid of it. I know we know that it does, right? There's not a given
evening that you can watch it, that it will not use, in your presence, profanity,
obscenity.
"Is there any nudity,
or matters of pornography?" You know if I were to come to your house and a woman
dressed the way that the women on that set dressed you would not let me in your house.
You'd say, "You offend me by coming here with someone dressed like that. What's the
matter with you? But we let them in on the electronic media and, in fact, we pay hundreds
of extra dollars to get it in color. Do you, on that television, ever see unrighteous
themes exalted?" "All the time." "Do you ever see righteous themes
debased?" "Yeah" "And you have no problem watching those and having
that in your house on an instrument that you have to pay hundreds of dollars to get, that
you put right in the most traveled portion of your house, and that you have to make it do
it to you before it can do it to you?" What happened to our convictions? We have just
showed the court that through our lifestyles the conviction that we mouth is not
consistently practiced. In the courtroom the examination of the pastors and Christian
teachers is predominantly centered on, "Do you live your beliefs?"
Now, bear in mind, the
court said you don't have to believe anything. But if you say you believe something, and
if you say that it's a conviction, then the court says you must live it, at such
level that when we look at your life we can see it. You know what would happen if I stood
here with a glass of alcoholic beverage, and I told you, "I don't believe in alcohol
folks," and then I guzzled it? You'd say, "the man's crazy, he says one thing
and does another."
That's exactly what's
happening in the courtroom now. The court says these people say one thing, but they do
another. Now I've just used the example of a television, but they will go into all the
areas of entertainment, the use of your finances, the use of your time. +++
Reprinted from a pamphlet
published by Christian Law Association, P. O. Box 30, Conneaut, Ohio 44030 (216)599-8900.
We thank CLA for permission to reprint this important message.
It's been pretty quiet
this summer here at our family kingdom - living in the liberty of Jesus Christ. But then
the fun started again last Friday. The dog started barking so I looked out the window.
Traveling down our wooded canyon was a state car marked with Oregon public vehicle plates.
"Now which state agency has descended so unexpectedly upon us?" I murmured to
myself. "Which branch of state government has not heard us speak the word of
God?" I put on my jacket, told Rachel we had visitors from the state and walked
outside to greet them.
Two fine looking gentlemen
in their mid-twenties got out of the car and introduced themselves. They offered my wife
and me their business cards and claimed to be from the state Children's Services Division.
With a very confident air about them, they asked for Mr. 'Paul De Revoire.'
"He has died a civil
death. I'm Paul Revere, can I help you?"
The young social workers
glanced at each other with a skeptical look that said, "this guy is more of a kook
than we thought."
"How do you know he
died a civil death?" asserted the man named Tom.
"Do you know what the
term 'civil death' signifies in law?" I asked. "It means the person is cut off
from the rights and benefits of civil society. You see, I am not a member of your club. I
belong to another. My King is Jesus Christ, and I obey His commands."
"We're very happy you
have found Jesus Christ," they agreed. Then they proceeded with their agenda as if I
had said nothing.
"Do you have a child
named Brooke?" asked Larry.
I saw no need to answer
their questions because they had not established a foundation. What relationship do I have
with them?
"Listen, I don't know
what your purpose is for coming here. Are you here to save my life or destroy it?"
They wouldn't answer the
question, though I asked them half a dozen times during the course of their visit.
They thought that they
needed to warm up to me so they changed the subject.
"Sure is a nice place
you have here. Did you build your own house?"
I didn't answer.
"Is that your backhoe
over there? Do you use it to make a living? How do you support your family? Are you
employed?"
"God has blessed us
very well," I said. "I am going about my Father's business, not yours. I take
Jesus Christ very seriously. He is not a baby lying in a crib on Christmas Day. He has
risen and sits at the right hand of the Father, above every power and authority."
"Are you aware of the
state's mandatory school attendance laws?"
"I am not under the
laws of the state of Oregon because I serve another master. Since Jesus Christ is my Lord
and Savior, only Him do I obey."
"All of us living in
the territory of Oregon have an obligation to obey the state. You can't have your own set
of laws," interjected Larry.
"Have you forgotten
that my Father created the heavens and the earth and He also created Oregon. Just because
I live here does not mean I am under the laws of the state or that I must obey you. I am
in the world for Christ, but I am not of the world. I, like Jesus Christ, have died to the
basic principles of this world. Why, as though I belonged to the world, would I submit to
its rules? Jesus Christ forgave my sins and canceled the written code. Because I am doing
righteousness from a good heart, I fulfill the purpose of the law without being put under
the law."
"You say you're not
under the law," said Larry in a very authoritative voice, "just try telling that
to a black-robed judge. How far do you think you would get? We know you fear us, now open
up and answer our questions. You know if you don't cooperate with us you may find yourself
in a lengthy courtroom battle."
"In the first place,
I fear my Father - I don't fear you or what you can do to me. He is my Lord and Protector,
not you. Secondly, as far as scaring me with the courtroom scene, I've already been there.
I'm fully aware of their magnificently executed deception. Did you know Oregonians have
been robbed of their constitutional courts?"
"We don't care about
that, we're not lawyers. Now, how old is Brooke?"
"You're on my place,
you're taking up my time. You're going to listen for a few minutes to what I have to
say."
"Remember back in
good old public school," I began, "we were taught the separation of powers
doctrine? There are three separate but equal branches of government, the judicial, the
legislative and the executive. The Oregon constitution says that no person charged with
official duties under one of these branches shall exercise any of the functions of the
other. The separate branches were to be a check and balance so that no one branch could
rise above the others and control them. When all three branches of government are under
one authority, you have a kingdom or a dictatorship. In 1910, the Constitution was amended
so that the courts were created by law, instead of by the Constitution. Case law says the
legislature was given the authority to change the entire judicial system of the state -
and they have.
"Today, the
legislature, even though elected by the democratic process, acts as the king. They have
taken over control of the other branches of government and so there is no check against
their tyranny. Members of the democracy are expected to obey all the statutes the
legislature makes for the society.
"The legislature
makes the laws, they have a police force to enforce their laws and courts uphold their
statutes. Do you think there is any possibility for justice with such a stacked deck? Now
that the legislature has their kingdom, all they need are subjects and, sad to say, that
is what you are. (See article entitled "WHO STOLE OREGON'S COURTS" for more
information on the legislative courts, Embassy of Heaven NEWSLETTER, Issue No. 871, Winter
1992)
"I have removed
myself from all the enticements of the legislature. I obey God rather than men. Since I am
separate from the democracy, you'll have to find a court better than the legislative
tribunals to adjudicate anything with me. Those administrative units are by and for
members of the democracy and would not be qualified to render an impartial decision for
someone outside their realm."
Of course, they were not
interested in my discourse and were itchy to move on with their probing.
"Would you be willing
to come to our office and sign some papers so we can grant you a waiver to teach your
children at home?" asked Larry.
"My goodness,
no," I replied firmly. "If I seek permission from you, then I am acknowledging
your authority over me. Why do you want to oversee my activities when I already have my
Shepherd? Don't you realize the early followers of Christ were thrown to the lions rather
than being brought under the power of Caesar? For 200 years it was a crime punishable by
death to verbally deny that Caesar was lord. The police were given the power to bring
followers of Christ in to be executed just because they stated Jesus Christ was their
Lord, not Caesar. Now I am telling you the same thing. What are you going to do with me?
Do you think it is a crime for me to live in the Spirit of Jesus Christ and be separate
from you?"
They did not answer me
directly, but instead asked if there were many others like me out here.
"Now wouldn't that
make your job interesting," I said with a grin. "I guess that's something you'll
just have to find out."
"Let me demonstrate
further that I belong to someone else.
"Do you see that
pickup and car parked over there? Now look at your vehicle. Do you see any obvious
differences? Notice the car you drove has state plates. I have no state vehicle plates or
driver's license. I'm not marked by the state. My Father knows me and I know Him."
"Yes," Tom said,
"but do you ever drive off your own property?"
"Sure," I said,
"I go places all the time."
"Do you ever get
picked up?" Tom asked in disbelief.
"Yes, and when I go
to jail I fast and pray that those who are doing wickedness will see the errors of their
ways and repent."
"Could we take a look
at the curriculum you are using for your daughter?" Tom asked, attempting to get on
with their goals.
"I am very pleased
with the education my daughter is receiving. Thank you," I said.
"When did you start
educating your child?" Larry inquired.
"Oh, I guess it was
the day she was born," I replied.
"That's not what we
mean and you know it," exclaimed Larry in an exasperated tone. "Why won't you be
serious and tell us the things we ask you. Why are you keeping secrets?"
"I do everything in
the open. I do not like dark alleys. But why should I tell you anything. I don't know what
you're going to do with the information. You haven't told me whether you came to destroy
my life or to save it. If we were friends, and I knew you very well, then maybe, I would
want to talk with you and tell you these things. But you did not come here as a friend.
You came here representing the laws of the state of Oregon. Because of your position with
the state, you want me to tell you what I have been doing so you can report to your
supervisors. But those people aren't my authorities. Look fellows, for me to answer your
questions would be obeying you and I'm not one of your children.
"Before I can answer
your queries," I continued, "you must establish the foundation of why you are
here and what evidence you have that I belong to the state of Oregon. Now, let's start
with this question, what brought you out here?"
"We received a
complaint," answered Tom.
"Who complained about
us?"
"Oh, we can't tell
you that. By Oregon law, the identity of the complainant is kept secret," said Larry.
"Now wait a
minute," I interposed, "You've been accusing me of keeping secrets, why are you
keeping secrets from me? You want us to show you all our laundry, yet you won't so much as
tell us the name of our accuser. Why is everyone acting like they don't want to come
forward and testify of the crime - if there truly has been a crime committed?
"I think that whoever
made the accusation must think I am still that old man who belonged to the democracy. But
let me show you something. I'll be right back.
"Look in here,"
I said, as I returned with the phone book, "can you find the name of that person you
came down here seeking?" I queried.
"You won't find that
person listed. Now look under Paul Revere. See, there I am, right after Remington."
"You mean if we call
you at this number or write to Paul Revere we'll get you?" they asked in amazement.
"You sure will,"
I said confidently, "and besides, you'll score a first. No government agency has ever
written to me!"
Larry was quick to say,
"I'll write you a letter outlining the Oregon statutes on school attendance and I'll
highlight the pertinent parts."
"You're not hearing a
word I'm saying, are you?" I exclaimed, "Let me illustrate my relationship to
you.
"For this example,
Larry, you be a Catholic priest."
"Oh no! I don't want
to be a priest," protested Larry.
"You have no choice
about it, Larry, you're on my place and for this moment in time you're going to be a
Catholic priest. Now you come knocking at my door and when I open it you say, 'Mr. Revere,
we've noticed you have not been attending Sunday mass and you haven't been tithing on a
regular basis. We want you to come down to the church and defend yourself before our
church council.'"
"Now two choices come
to mind. Number one, I could seek out the Canon lawbooks, study them, and build my case.
Then at the appointed time, come down to the church and defend myself. Do you like this
approach?"
Larry nodded in agreement.
"There is a second
choice available to me," I continued. "Right here and now I can tell you, Mr.
Priest, (for the Bible says call no man father) I - AM - NOT - A - CATHOLIC!"
All of a sudden you could
see it written all over Larry's face - he understood it, I AM NOT ONE OF YOURS.
"Now, Mr. Priest, why
don't you visit John down the road. He tells me he's a Catholic, but I've seen him mowing
his lawn on Sunday morning.
"In other words, just
because there are Canon laws, doesn't mean they apply to me," I continued. The same
thing is true with Oregon laws. Through the example I just gave you, I am trying to
demonstrate that I am completely separate from the democracy of Oregon. I am responsible
to another and He judges me, not you. Now the only time you could have a valid complaint
against me is if I break my Father's commandments. In other words, if I am no longer
showing that I love God and my neighbor."
Finally, when I could tell
they were seeing a glimmer of the Light, they looked at their watches and Larry said,
"It's very late. We're sorry we really have to get back."
It was now 6:00 p.m. and
they had arrived about 45 minutes earlier.
"We'll do some more
checking in the files and contact you next week," explained Larry as he quickly got
in the state car. "Oh, by the way, we didn't realize you were so political. You must
have really caused some turmoil down at the Senate. We can tell you this, the complaint
that brought us here came out of the Senate. Good-bye now."
Larry didn't know it, but
his last comment left no doubt in my mind who had originated the complaint. As is typical,
the complaint came from a neighbor who has a working relationship with a particular
senator. Apparently, the neighbor, who had recently talked with our daughter about her
home schooling, felt compelled to have the state investigate. Consequently, he called on
his friendly senator to get the action started.
We immediately wrote a
letter to the administrator of Children's Services Division confessing that we were new
creatures who belonged to Christ's kingdom. The people they were looking for have died a
civil death. The new creatures have no birth certificates, licenses, social security
numbers, bank accounts, credit cards, insurance policies or other evidence that they
belong to the democracy. We are citizens of Heaven and under the separate government of
Jesus Christ. We are not part of the state's lawmaking because Christ is the end of the
law for everyone who believes (Romans 10:4).
We stated that the public
schools were funded by and for members of the democracy and we do not qualify. To force
someone from Christ's government to attend their government's schools is placing them into
involuntary servitude to the will of the democracy. We must obey God rather than men.
Our letter apparently
ended the investigation. We never received a response from the administrator or the two
social workers who visited us. We welcomed the experience with Children's Services because
it gave us another opportunity to testify of our King. As for our neighbor, we forgive him
for he knows not what he does.
Reprinted from Embassy of
Heaven NEWSLETTER, Issue No. 884, Fall 1988.
Those of us who are
seeking to raise a child in the Way of the Lord often encounter a roadblock - the state's
compulsory education laws. Parents who do not comply with these laws are often uneasy
about what might happen when school officials find out their child is not enrolled in any
school. We have been given a solution that often turns back the battle at the gate (Isaiah
28:6). Parents register their child in the Embassy of Heaven Christian School. Then, when
the local authorities question the child's education, the parents show evidence that the
child is registered in a school. Having the child's education supervised by a schooling
authority, often prevents the state from moving ahead with charges against the parents.
Showing school registration documents has stopped the state from sending parents to jail
and the child to a foster home.
The state assumes the
responsibility of seeing that all children are educated in the ways of the world so that
they will be productive members of society. State laws require that school age children be
registered in school. In some states, the school district will grant the parents a
privilege to educate their children at home - on the condition that the home school is
registered with them. But even with a home school, the state wants to maintain supervision
and control.
What is a citizen of
Heaven to do? If the state wants the children registered in school, we'll register them.
But we will not put our children's education under the supervision of the state - we are
the ones responsible to God for raising our children in the Way they are to go. We
register them with the authority that we are under - Jesus Christ, through His Church. We
register them in the Embassy of Heaven Christian School. We register our children, not
because we are subject to the state's laws, but out of consideration for our weaker
brethren. We love them, and don't want to cause them to stumble. The weaker brethren
believe that all children must be registered in school. They want the children's education
to be supervised - and they do not believe parents are qualified.
Registering with the
Embassy of Heaven Christian School fulfills the supervisory requirements of their law. The
child is registered in school. Now the only argument left is who you registered with? Are
we compelled to register with a foreign government when we are citizens of Heaven? Now we
throw the argument into a Kingdom issue. Are we not free to serve Jesus Christ and His
Kingdom?
The Embassy of Heaven
Christian School registration procedure is simple. The parents request a school enrollment
for their child. We send them the enrollment form, they fill it out and send it back to
the Church. We return a letter, sealed by the Church, saying that the child has been
accepted as a student in the Embassy of Heaven Christian school.
The Embassy of Heaven
Christian School is different from the other schools, right at its foundation. We operate
under the authority of God, not under any state-granted privilege. Parents are the
teachers and the learning program is based on the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The
children do not gather in a central place like typical modern schools. We actually teach
the children in a home setting, but it is not a "home school." The reason it is
not a "home school" is because that term has special meaning under state
statutes and denotes a privilege by the state. So we are not a "home school,"
even though the education is carried out in the home. It is an extension of the Embassy of
Heaven Christian School. If anyone challenges the education of their child in their home,
they are to respond, "My child is enrolled in the Embassy of Heaven Christian
School."
Giving to those who ask
When parents have
documents that show their child is enrolled in a school, much strife and persecution is
avoided. For instance there was a man who was thrown in jail for contempt of court. The
judge said, "You're staying in jail until you register your home school with the
state or enroll your children in school." A friend of his, who knew about our school,
sent us enrollment requests and we sent back the acceptance documents. The judge looked at
the enrollment documents and said to the parent, "You're out of here." And he
was released from jail.
We had another instance
where a man was being threatened with jail if he did not register his home school. He went
to court and told the judge, "All four of my children have been registered in the
Embassy of Heaven Christian School." The judge declared the matter was moot and
closed the proceedings against him. All the dogs were pulled off and he did not go to
jail.
Last year we had a 13 year
old girl who was going to be sent to a foster home. She was enrolled in public school and
was having truancy problems. The school district was building a case to justify sending
her to a foster home. Her doctor, neighbors and teachers were all making affidavits
against her, instead of trying to help her work out her problems. She panicked and fled
half way across the country to her grandparents. The grandparents immediately enrolled her
in the local public school. After one day, the child ran away. When she showed up again at
the grandparents, she said she wasn't going back to school. She wanted to be taught at
home. She agreed not to run away if she did not have to go back to public school.
The grandparents got in
touch with us and enrolled her in our School. Meanwhile, because she had enrolled in the
public school, the school file carrying the information on sending her to a foster home
was sent to the local school. The local school wasted no time in proceeding ahead with the
action against the girl. The case that had been built against her in Oregon followed her
to the new school in the midwest. The grandparents found themselves in the midst of a
custody battle. They arrived in court with the school enrollment documents from the Church
and the case was dropped. The local school authorities did not have jurisdiction to
proceed ahead since she was no longer enrolled in one of their schools.
Another service of the
Embassy of Heaven Christian School is requesting records from the school your child has
previously been attending. We did this for the 13-year old girl mentioned above and the
public school sent them. The following year, the girl returned to live with her parents
and was again enrolled in public school. The public school requested her records from the
Embassy of Heaven Christian School. We knew there were many incriminating documents in the
school file so we notified the parents and held a hearing. The child and her Mother were
able to review the file and destroy or amend any documents that were objectionable. The
amended file was then sent to the public school. The hearsay information and false
testimony was removed from the record and the girl was able to start the year with a fresh
slate.
These are true stories.
And they work. The Embassy of Heaven Christian School is a place where parents can educate
their children in the home. The parents act as teachers. They do not have to be certified
by the state, because the Church is not under the authority of the state. The Church
remains separate at all times. The Church can retrieve records from public schools and get
them out of the control of the state. These records, once they are under the Church's
control, become the Church's responsibility and we can clean up those files if necessary.
There are many of us who
are trying to make a Christian stand, a separation from the worldly powers. We can use the
Embassy of Heaven Christian School as an avenue to relieve some of the persecution. The
School registration documents provide written evidence of who our Lord is and where our
authority comes from. Having something in writing makes it easier for others to see that
there is more than one jurisdiction. The state is not the only one on the block. Christ
shed His blood so that we can be freed from the state - so that we can be free from the
worldly powers and the worldly ways. His blood does not need to be shed again. His blood
is done once and for all. And He was raised up, and He is raised up in us.
As another example, a
family spent several months traveling from state to state preaching the good news of
Christ's kingdom. One day the police stopped them and hauled their Dad off to jail. Then
social workers and sheriff's deputies tried to seize the children. The school enrollment
papers were shown - but the officers just scoffed at them. Social workers spent the next
2- 1/2 hours attempting to take the children. Their Mother just set her mind on Christ as
her Protector and confessed Him: "The children and I will not be separated in any
way by your social services department. We have committed no crime and are being detained
illegally. We have nothing to do with the state and the state has nothing to do with us.
We belong to Christ and His Church." The officers immediately left off their
intimidations and did not take the children.
Presenting school
enrollment documents is often all that is necessary to satisfy most people. But sometimes
officials may just scoff at them - then that piece of paper is not enough. We must show
our conviction. If we stand in faithfulness to Him, He will give us words and wisdom that
none of our adversaries will be able to resist or contradict (Luke 21:15).
The problem that most of
us are having is that we clean out the house, we clean out the wickedness, but we forget
to invite in the good spirits. That is what the Embassy of Heaven Christian School is
about. It replaces the wickedness of the world's ways with something good, so that there
is no place for the evil to get a stronghold. If they want our children in school, we'll
enroll them in a school - but it will be Christ's school.
The Embassy of Heaven
Christian School is just as real as their school. We perform the same function, except we
do it better - we do it in the Lord's way. We don't waste time having children memorize
state capitols. Instead, we teach them about Christianity, the New Testament, the New
Covenant - how to love one another. The things that are meat, the things that count. We
don't clutter up our children's brains with things of the world that have no relevance to
their lives.
Once your child is
enrolled in the Embassy of Heaven Christian School, you need to teach him or her how to
answer questions from those who are curious about their schooling. "What school do
you go to, child?" The child responds, "Embassy of Heaven Christian
School." And no suspicion is raised. But it is easy to forget and say, "I go to
home school." Now the casual questioner becomes suspicious. "Oh you do?"
and they begin checking you out. "You go to home school, huh? Who teaches you? Does
the state approve of it? Does the local school know about this?" They might ask
hundreds of questions that are none of their business, but your child has already opened
up the door. Keep the door closed by saying, "I go to Embassy of Heaven Christian
School."
When you are going out
during normal school hours, you might be asked why your child is not in school. Just tell
them you're on a field trip. You don't have to hide in the corners. Carry on a normal life
style. Use the words the people have been programmed to understand and you will find that
these people will not pry into your business. By telling them your child is enrolled in a
school, their mind is set at ease.
If they want to know where
the Embassy of Heaven Christian School is, you can give them one of two places. You can
tell them that it is based out of Sublimity, Oregon. Or, give them the address of your
home, since that is where the education is occurring. They probably won't go any further
than that. It is none of their business. It is the Lord's business. Most people are just
curious. When they hear the word school, their mind is reassured that everything is
normal. "Why is your child out here when she should be in school?" They are
confused, help them out. If you can settle their mind and ease their conscience, then you
can go on your way. I believe we bring much of the persecution upon ourselves. Every man
ought to have the Word for everything he does. Give to those who ask. Unfortunately, the
world is made up of meddlers and snoops - people who have nothing better to do. But give
them a hand, settle their mind. Then you can go on your way and do the Lord's work quietly
without being harassed.
As citizens of Heaven, we
are educating our children under the government of Jesus Christ, not the state. But the
state can be persistent in demanding that all children be enrolled in school.
It is often helpful in
overcoming these officials if we are affiliated with a school. If the state wants our
children registered in school, we'll register them - but we'll register them under the
jurisdiction that we belong to - Heaven. We'll show these officials evidence that our
children are enrolled in the Embassy of Heaven Christian School. By giving to those who
ask, we hope to turn the battle away at the gate.
Questions and Answers
Who is eligible for
enrollment in the Embassy of Heaven Christian School?
Any school-age child of a
parent or guardian who has given allegiance to Jesus Christ and declares citizenship in
Heaven.
Does the Embassy of
Heaven Christian School provide a specific curriculum?
No, we leave curriculum to
the discretion of the parents. Parents, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, tailor
their child's individual learning program.
What is the advantage
of enrolling my child in the Embassy of Heaven Christian School?
The school provides
written evidence that your child is being educated under the authority of Jesus Christ,
through His holy nation of Heaven. When parents have documents that show their child is
enrolled in a school, much strife and persecution is avoided.
What services does
Embassy of Heaven Christian School provide?
-
Enrollment letter, sealed
by Embassy of Heaven, showing child is registered in school.
-
Photo identification card
for student.
-
Transfer of student records
from previous school.
Record Transfers
If your child has
previously attended a public or private school, we can remove the child's student records
from the school. Parents complete the Request for Student Record and we forward the
completed form to the school specified.
It's not too late to
register your children in our School. Just send us a stamped, self-addressed envelope and
we'll send information and enrollment forms. Let us know how many children you want to
enroll. The Embassy of Heaven Christian School is open to families who claim citizenship
in Heaven. For those who have funds, we ask for a small donation to help cover the
expenses of providing this service.
